17 Jan. 2008

Gustav Hayes Editorial Process

Posted by robert under Beta Books, Gustav Hayes |

Hi everyone.

This week on Gustav Hayes we are slowing down from showing glitzy previews of the actual artwork to go behind the curtain a touch further. To begin. I had asked Morgan Jeske to give his insight into the process of building Gustav Hayes up to date. I thought this would appeal to those pitching and writing scripts - to hear the process from the writers perspective. Yes it is an easy blog post on my part. If I am feeling up to it (bloody head cold) than I might do a follow-up post else I will continue further upon this and more Gustav Hayes news next week. For now, take it away Morgan…

Morgan Jeske self portraitThe Beta Book Editorial Process- Writers’ POV

The information was beamed to our respective brains from satellites the government doesn’t want us to know about, in the form of pink laser beams. It hurt…real hard. But seriously.

As I remember it, a series of introductory emails were exchanged between Robert (my editor) and myself, wherein we compared taste in comics, film, music etc. to get a sense of one another (it’s not what your like that matters, it’s what you like, silly) Quickly we dispensed with the pleasantries and got down to brass tax, reviewing the “script”(I think I wrote the original draft in crayon).

In my case, I had already formatted the script in one of many possible comic script templates. Panel description/action-Dialogue etc. So we had a leg up in that regard. Robert reviewed the script and sent back very detailed and constructive notes, suggesting changes in pacing and panel arrangement. Based on these brilliant notes, I took my baby (script) and cut off its arms (extraneous fat). You see without arms, it will fly out of the cannon faster. I developed the story in a way that allowed me to not get attached to any one aspect, very common law you might say, allowing the process to run very smoothly. I made changes, for the better, and we both approved the finalized script!

Robert (editor extraordinaire) hunkered down for what I can assume was a weekend filled with vodka and smelling salts, and thumb nailed the entire script for my leisurely viewing pleasure. Over at the dashboard, Robert and myself discussed the thumbnails compared to the script, also on the dashboard, and worked out any kinks in the story flow.

Parallel with our discussions of thumbnails, Robert and myself compiled what we refer to as a Vision Document. In this “bible” we crammed all of the influences for the story, be it images or links to similar comics. Also included were the aesthetic choices, such as, color palette, penciling style etc. In my case, I had already produced a story bible prior to the book getting picked up, so it was like a double whammy of culture. The purpose of the Document is to get the editors and the entire art team on the same page with regard to the overall tone and direction of the book. When all of the materials were combined, Robert and I reviewed and approved the Vision Document.

The next step was to choose our art team. This was the moment I had been dreaming about, on the nights I wasn’t dreaming about being the lizard the Kirk fights to the death on ‘Trek”, oh, to be blasted by the mighty rock shooting gun that Spock built(?!). Robert presented me with an artist whose style matched exactly what I described in the Vision Document (it’s really important see!) The Vision Document and the script were sent to the artist, and a series of character sketches were done and loaded onto the Dashboard for review by Robert and myself. After we settled on the art that worked, an official Pin-up to promote the book was requested of the artist. Once it came in we reviewed and approved it. On to Page X!

This is where the magical part of being a comic’s writer comes in. A page was chosen from the script, which represents the overall tone of the book, a page that contains within it, all the awesome the book has to offer. The artist penciled the page, we reviewed, requested revisions and approved. The penciled page was then sent to the inker, who inked (obviously), we reviewed and approved. Next the page was sent to colorist (who also happens to be the inker on ‘Hayes’, BONUS!!) We reviewed, requested changes and requested a few more, then finally approved. Last but not least, the letterer got his shot and turned in the “words” I wrote. Approved! This brings me to why this is so totally and completely awesome, I wrote some trite derivative story, and some really talented people took what I saw in my head and ran with it. In the case of Hayes, the pages that came in were interpreted in totally unique ways, beyond my expectations.

So there you have it, the process as I remember it. If I’ve left anyone or anything out and you’re reading this, and are enraged by my ignorance, please feel free to set your Bowel Disruptors to Pro-lapse and fire away.

I love you Comic Books!

Morgan Jeske
Gustav Hayes- writer


Comments (10)

  • Guh! It’s called a “Gorn”. Sheesh!

    Comment by crackwalker | January 17th, 2008 @ 10:59 am

  • So as I understand the ‘Page X’ stage is the last stop before setting the artist loose on it, and letting him go ahead and pencil the whole book… is that right?

    Comment by crackwalker | January 17th, 2008 @ 11:02 am

  • Yes that is correct!

    Comment by robert | January 17th, 2008 @ 11:06 am

  • Sorry Crackwalker! I always forget its name. In my dreams it’s known simply as ’sweetness’…uhhmmm…creepy much?

    Comment by MorganJ | January 17th, 2008 @ 11:19 am

  • Its sad that you knew that Crack.

    …of course, *I* knew you were right, so doubly sad.

    Comment by Lord Maim | January 17th, 2008 @ 12:13 pm

  • The episode ‘Arena’ is a childhood favorite. One of my earliest memories is of watching that episode on a Sunday afternoon on the CBC. Those afternoons were ephemeral, magical periods of time. Kirks’ two footed drop-kick echoes through my brain-meat to this day.

    Comment by MorganJ | January 17th, 2008 @ 12:52 pm

  • You have no idea how sad it is… you would have to know how very well I know that important piece of trek-ness. There was absolutely no delay between the reading of Morgan’s post, and my posting a correction. I stopped reading, posted, and then finished the rest.

    That’s real estate in my brain that could be holding quotations from Sun Tzu, or the molar weight of Radon, or a recipe for some delicious salad; but no. I have perfect recall of the name of the lizard guy that Kirk shoots with the rock gun. (BTW it fired uncut diamonds)

    Comment by crackwalker | January 17th, 2008 @ 1:29 pm

  • I do have a question about your revision process -

    How different was the finalized script from your original? Did you make all the changes yourself, or did Robert add stuff in himself?

    Comment by crackwalker | January 17th, 2008 @ 1:32 pm

  • “How different was the finalized script from your original? Did you make all the changes yourself, or did Robert add stuff in himself?”

    Good question. The revised version of the script was only altered slightly, which is good. There was no drastic overhall, but, the changes that were suggested were done so with the betterment of the book in mind. If Robert had suggested Act 3 would better suit the narrative with an army of Panda Hookers attacking our heroes, and I agreed, I would have made the change. Ultimately it was my decision to change it or not though. That being said, entering this with your “baby” clinging madly to your teet is the wrong approach.

    I was met with the sense that we all want this comic to be the best comic in the history of comics. I hope that answers your question.

    Cheers!

    Comment by MorganJ | January 17th, 2008 @ 3:56 pm

  • Yes. The question comes about from my differing experiences in writing for two mediums; theatre and television.

    My experience of theatre is that the playwright is god of all words. No one else can add any words to the script. The director can decide to cut lines, but may add nothing. Sometimes a writer will be involved in a workshopping or rehearsal process, and new lines can be added to a script, but they always have to come from the playwright.

    My experience of television is that the screenwriter is the whore of all words. Sometimes it seems like anyone can add a line if it will help the show make the schedule. At the end of the day, a lot of the script that has your name on it may not actually be sentences you came up with yourself. That’s just the nature of the incredibly fast pace of the TV production environment. So much money on the line, there’s not always time to let the writer go off with notes from everyone and write a new draft. They just hack and slash the script as they go, and fix it all in the editing room.

    Comment by crackwalker | January 18th, 2008 @ 2:04 pm

Leave a Comment